Your Name Is the Byline: Why Every Attorney Needs Their Own Site in the Age of AI Search
Founder · publish.law
Building open publishing infrastructure that helps legal professionals reach the people who need them. From branded firm publications and topic sponsorships on The Legal Examiner, to independent Ghost-based sites through publish.law, to the portable credentialing layer at OLPN — connecting the platforms that make lawyers easier to find and trust.
Nick Carroll has spent three decades building the infrastructure that helps lawyers reach the people who need them. He leads The Legal Examiner, one of the longest-running legal publishing platforms in the U.S., where law firms build authority and connect with their communities through branded publications and topic sponsorships.
His work now spans three connected brands. The Legal Examiner is where firms publish and distribute to a national audience. publish.law, which he founded, gives individual attorneys and boutique firms their own independent site, newsletter, and open web presence on a domain they own. And the Open Legal Publishing Network (OLPN), which he also founded, is the open identity and credentialing layer that ties them together — giving legal professionals a portable, verifiable presence that travels across platforms.
Across all three, the goal is the same: make legal information more accessible, and make the professionals behind it easier to find, verify, and trust — whether the people looking are potential clients, referral sources, or the AI systems that increasingly shape how lawyers get discovered.
Topic Guides on The Legal Examiner
Platforms & Products
A Firm Publication is a branded content hub on a Legal Examiner subdomain — like neworleans.legalexaminer.com — where law firms publish articles, commentary, and news under their own masthead. Every post automatically cross-posts to the main Legal Examiner with the canonical URL staying at the firm’s subdomain. Firm publications are included in The Legal Examiner’s Google News index and distribution channels, including email newsletters and the open web via ActivityPub.
Topic Sponsorships pair a law firm with a specific practice area on The Legal Examiner — like sexual abuse or Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The sponsoring firm collaborates on pillar content, provides expert review, and gains dedicated visibility through lead-generation forms, author profiles, and contextual placement throughout the topic cluster. It’s a way to build topical authority while connecting with people actively researching that legal issue.
publish.law is for individual attorneys and small firms who want their own independent publishing presence — not on a Legal Examiner subdomain, but on their own domain. It’s Ghost-based hosting with built-in newsletters, analytics, and open web distribution through ActivityPub. Think of it as the solo practitioner and boutique firm counterpart to a Legal Examiner Firm Publication.
The Open Legal Publishing Network (OLPN) is an open identity and credentialing layer for legal professionals. It gives attorneys a verifiable digital identity that connects their publishing activity, professional credentials, and institutional affiliations across platforms — whether they publish on The Legal Examiner, publish.law, or any participating site. OLPN is currently in development at olpn.org.
Whether you’re a firm looking for distribution or a solo practitioner ready to publish, there’s a place for you on the network.
Become a Contributor
Nick Carroll
Your site's job used to be getting the click. Now it's being credible enough that AI systems trust it as a source. The article lays out what that shift actually means: structured content, clear authorship, and a site that signals expertise rather than just existing.
Nick Carroll
John Mueller confirmed that AI training crawlers are actively hitting sitemaps and RSS feeds. If you publish anything online under your name, your sitemap and RSS feed are part of how AI systems find and index your work. Having those set up and pointing at everything you've written isn't optional anymore if you want to show up in AI-generated answers.
Nick Carroll
Cloudflare's traffic data shows automated requests now outnumber human ones, with AI agents growing fastest. That means your site already has a non-human audience reading it constantly. What you publish, how it's structured, and whether AI can make sense of it matters just as much as whether a person can.
Nick Carroll
"What could the founder of a baseball team known for dancing players and a senior-citizen dance squad possibly teach lawyers about running a small firm?" That's Bob Ambrogi, on hearing that Savannah Bananas founder Jesse Cole was keynoting this year's Kaleidoscope. The answer turned out to be plenty. Bob came away with 15 takeaways for small firms, and most of them are sharper than what you'd get from a legal marketing panel.
Nick Carroll
Schema markup tells search engines and AI systems exactly who you are and what you practice, in a format machines can read without guessing. If your site doesn't have it, you're leaving your name and expertise off the table. This piece walks through what's worth adding in 2026, and attorneys with a publish.law site get schema.org structured data shipped automatically under their name on every post and page.
Nick Carroll
NLWeb is an emerging protocol that lets AI agents query websites directly in plain language, essentially making your site conversational. It's early, but if AI is how clients start finding attorneys, having a site structured for machine-readable queries puts your name ahead of those that aren't.
Nick Carroll
Google referral traffic dropped 40% year over year.
Nick Carroll
ChatGPT is rolling out ads, which means AI visibility now has a paid lane and an earned lane. The earned side, getting cited because you've published genuinely useful, authoritative writing under your own name, is still the one that compounds. This piece walks through how the two interact and how to measure what's actually working.
Nick Carroll
David Arato is right. We've all seen lawyers burned by AI errors in court filings. The same risk applies to your bio, your posts, and your social copy: a made-up verdict or credential is a misleading statement about your services, and the rules on that don't loosen because it's marketing. Every fact is your responsibility. Check it, the same way you'd check a filing.
Nick Carroll
Google's Lighthouse tool now includes an audit specifically for AI agent discoverability, which means there's a testable standard for whether your site is structured in a way AI systems can actually read and use. If your writing and profiles live on a domain you own, running this audit tells you whether AI search can actually see you.
Nick Carroll
If you've been publishing to get found and wondering whether any of it shows up in AI answers, this piece lays out a step-by-step process for checking where AI cites sources in your topic area and getting your content into that mix. The workflow is practical enough to run yourself without a marketing team behind you.
Nick Carroll
Google is building features that let people follow creators directly inside search, which means fewer clicks out to your actual site. For anyone building an audience around their name, the implication is clear: your site still matters, but you need to own the relationship, not just the ranking.
Nick Carroll
Generic content doesn't get cited in AI answers. What does: original observations, validated claims, and real experience you can only get from actually practicing. If you're writing about your area of law from your own practice, you're already ahead of most. The article lays out how to make that work visible to AI systems.
Nick Carroll
AI can produce passable prose, but it can't replicate your judgment, your read on a situation, or your years in a specific practice area. The piece argues that expertise and original thinking are now the scarce resource, and that's exactly where your name, your reputation, and your byline carry weight that generic content never will.
Nick Carroll
Google confirmed that GSC (Google Search Console) doesn't measure how often your name or writing shows up in AI-mode answers. If you've been using clicks and impressions to gauge whether you're getting found, you're missing a growing slice of the picture entirely. For now, you need other signals: direct checks in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews by name.