The Benefits of Third-Party Legal Publishing: Why Your Firm Website Isn't Enough in the Age of AI Search
Founder · publish.law
Building open publishing infrastructure that helps legal professionals reach the people who need them. From branded firm publications and topic sponsorships on The Legal Examiner, to independent Ghost-based sites through publish.law, to the portable credentialing layer at OLPN — connecting the platforms that make lawyers easier to find and trust.
Nick Carroll has spent three decades building the infrastructure that helps lawyers reach the people who need them. He leads The Legal Examiner, one of the longest-running legal publishing platforms in the U.S., where law firms build authority and connect with their communities through branded publications and topic sponsorships.
His work now spans three connected brands. The Legal Examiner is where firms publish and distribute to a national audience. publish.law, which he founded, gives individual attorneys and boutique firms their own independent site, newsletter, and open web presence on a domain they own. And the Open Legal Publishing Network (OLPN), which he also founded, is the open identity and credentialing layer that ties them together — giving legal professionals a portable, verifiable presence that travels across platforms.
Across all three, the goal is the same: make legal information more accessible, and make the professionals behind it easier to find, verify, and trust — whether the people looking are potential clients, referral sources, or the AI systems that increasingly shape how lawyers get discovered.
Topic Guides on The Legal Examiner
Platforms & Products
A Firm Publication is a branded content hub on a Legal Examiner subdomain — like neworleans.legalexaminer.com — where law firms publish articles, commentary, and news under their own masthead. Every post automatically cross-posts to the main Legal Examiner with the canonical URL staying at the firm’s subdomain. Firm publications are included in The Legal Examiner’s Google News index and distribution channels, including email newsletters and the open web via ActivityPub.
Topic Sponsorships pair a law firm with a specific practice area on The Legal Examiner — like sexual abuse or Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The sponsoring firm collaborates on pillar content, provides expert review, and gains dedicated visibility through lead-generation forms, author profiles, and contextual placement throughout the topic cluster. It’s a way to build topical authority while connecting with people actively researching that legal issue.
publish.law is for individual attorneys and small firms who want their own independent publishing presence — not on a Legal Examiner subdomain, but on their own domain. It’s Ghost-based hosting with built-in newsletters, analytics, and open web distribution through ActivityPub. Think of it as the solo practitioner and boutique firm counterpart to a Legal Examiner Firm Publication.
The Open Legal Publishing Network (OLPN) is an open identity and credentialing layer for legal professionals. It gives attorneys a verifiable digital identity that connects their publishing activity, professional credentials, and institutional affiliations across platforms — whether they publish on The Legal Examiner, publish.law, or any participating site. OLPN is currently in development at olpn.org.
Whether you’re a firm looking for distribution or a solo practitioner ready to publish, there’s a place for you on the network.
Become a Contributor
Nick Carroll
A federal judge in an active antitrust case called Google's AI Overviews "really unfair" to publishers. If you publish content to get found, that content is now feeding answers that push your site down or out entirely. This case could change the economics of publishing online, and you'll want to watch it.
Nick Carroll
ChatGPT now retrieves content differently, and the gap between "pulled into context" and "actually cited" is where most content disappears. If you want your name showing up in AI answers, your writing needs clear attribution and structure, not just good information. The piece breaks down exactly what the system reads and what it skips.
Nick Carroll
Readers are getting faster at spotting AI-generated filler, and so are the search systems ranking it. If your byline is on content that reads like everyone else's, it drags your name down, not just that post. The antidote is writing that only you could have written: your cases, your opinions, your experience. That's what holds up.
Nick Carroll
ChatGPT picks brands to query before it ever fetches live results. Being in that pre-selected set is worth roughly 33x more than showing up in the retrieval step. For getting your name recommended, it means consistent, citable writing under your own name matters more than chasing keywords.
Nick Carroll
Legal content is YMYL too, which means the same standards that determine whether a health article gets cited in AI answers apply to your writing. This piece breaks down what actually earns inclusion.
Nick Carroll
Keywords are losing ground to topics. If you've been writing one-off posts on whatever came to mind, this explains why a tighter focus on a specific practice area tends to compound over time, both in Google and in what AI systems pull when someone asks about your field.
Nick Carroll
If you've been putting off video because you weren't sure where to start, this is a current look at what's actually working for attorneys building a personal presence through short and long-form content.
Nick Carroll
Cloudflare is arguing that AI agents are a new class of visitor, with a real human behind every query. That reframes the whole GEO question: you're not optimizing for bots, you're making yourself findable to people who've delegated the searching to AI. Worth reading if you're thinking about where referrals come from next.
Nick Carroll
Your publish.law site now works from inside Claude or ChatGPT. Add a credential, publish a note, schedule one for the morning, catch up on what's waiting, all by asking.
Not an AI lawyer. It doesn't write for you. It just handles the admin so you can stop opening a dashboard to change one line.
Free plan, no credit card.
Nick Carroll
Research confirms AI cites broadly but only recommends names it associates with a specific topic repeatedly. If your writing covers a little of everything, you're getting mentioned nowhere that matters. Pick your practice area, go deep, and stay consistent. That's the pattern AI systems reward with actual recommendations, not just citations.
Nick Carroll
AI search tools don't look at your zip code. They look at your bar profile, your reviews, and whether your published results match the places you say you practice. If those signals are thin or inconsistent, you don't show up, even locally. Worth reading carefully if you want AI answers to name you when someone nearby is searching for what you do.
Nick Carroll
40% of AI citations drop the brand name entirely and just reference the content. If your writing lives only on a firm site, you may be getting cited without your name attached. Publishing under your own name, with your own profile clearly connected, is how you make sure the credit lands on you.
Nick Carroll
Personal posts, bylines, and social content are increasingly what AI systems pull from when building answers, so your name showing up in more places isn't vanity, it's how citations happen.
Nick Carroll
ChatGPT now pulls Yelp reviews directly into answers about local businesses, and that includes law firms. If someone asks ChatGPT for a lawyer in your city, your Yelp rating may show up in the reply. Your reviews are now part of how AI describes you, not just how Google ranks you locally.
Nick Carroll
Semrush dug into what actually gets a brand cited repeatedly by ChatGPT, and traditional SEO rankings barely correlate. What does: getting mentioned across many independent sources. For you, that means your name showing up in bar association profiles, published articles, podcast appearances, and colleagues' sites matters more than one well-optimized page.