The Supreme Court holds that the district court did not err in holding that the prior complaint was a nullity, and that an amended complaint could not relate back to the filing of the original pro se complaint.
Ultimately, the court determines the untimely disclosure was harmless and therefore, Baldwin will not be excluded.
The Court reversed the denial of Mason’s disability claim, and because Reliance already had two chances to get the assessment right, no remand was justified.
The Court also concludes the allegations do not demonstrate genuine issues of material fact, so the Court recommends that the judge find the proposed claim would likely be dismissed for Jones’ failure to show why the case would have to be submitted to a jury for resolution.
Under the PLA, the only way Tancrede could recover is to show that Freund injured her willfully.
